Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Accounting group, Yazd unit, Open Islamic University, Yazd, Iran

2 PhD Student, Department of Accounting, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

 
1- INTRODUCTION
An indicator of investors' trading behavior that affects asset prices is investor sentiment. Investor sentiment is known as a degree of investor's optimistic mood in financial markets. Company-specific investor sentiments have a significant impact on the risk of a stock price fall. There are two types of traders, simple noise traders and rational arbitrageurs (informed traders) in the market. When noise traders have high risk sentiment and are very optimistic about a stock, they can easily drive its price to a high level. At this point, arbitrageurs should sell the stock short. However, they fear that in the near future noise traders will become even more bullish and push the price even higher, limiting their prime arbitrage position. Under these conditions, arbitrage does not eliminate the effects of noise, because noise creates risk by itself. Stronger investor sentiments lead to the risk of a particular company's stock price falling, and the economic significance of this effect is not insignificant. Stronger investor sentiment leads to more active margin investments in stocks, leading to higher stock price risk. Therefore, the impact of investor sentiment on stock price downside risk is more pronounced for stocks eligible for margin trading. Hence, this research seeks to answer the question of whether the moderating role of the firm's growth opportunities and profitability has an effect on the value relationship of the risk perception of annual reports?
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The basic premise of using investors' risk sentiments to predict stock prices, stock market returns, and liquidity is the synergy between stock prices and investors' risk sentiments. However, this synergistic relationship has received less attention in the literature. When the stock price increases, the investor's risk sentiment increases, and when the stock price decreases, the investor's risk sentiment decreases. Therrfore, this synergy may reverse or even disappear over a certain period of time. Through a segmented measurement of the synergism between stock price and investor sentiment over the course of a day, we can also find that investor risk sentiment on social media is forward-looking. This provides theoretical support for the use of investor risk sentiment in stock price prediction. External anxiety can significantly affect the synergy between stock prices and investor risk sentiment, but this effect can increase positive or negative synergy. The existence of growth opportunities increases the performance of companies and shareholder wealth, which leads to participation in job creation and economic development, increasing the value of companies and the demand for high-quality innovation, and the improvement in the global market increases opportunities and competition, which also forces companies to invest and undertake riskier projects to maximize shareholder wealth. If investor risk sentiment does indeed drive asset prices, then analysts' recognition and treatment of risk sentiment may affect the relative profitability of their stock recommendations. For example, an analyst may believe that a particular stock is overvalued based on his private estimate of the company's intrinsic value. However, the analyst may hesitate to issue a sell recommendation if he believes that investor risk sentiment will continue to put upward pressure on asset prices in the short term. Furthermore, if the analyst believes that investors will become even more bullish in the near future, he may actually issue a buy recommendation. If the analyst (1) correctly anticipates an upward (downward) shift in investor sentiment that ultimately causes an increase (decrease) in asset prices and (2) issues a more favorable (unfavorable) recommendation in response, then the analyst's recommendation may be more profitable than his peers.
 
3- METHODOLOGY
The current research is based on the classification based on the goal, use, and in terms of classification, it was done using the descriptive-correlation method and using the post-event approach. To collect research data and information by document mining method, field method and databases of Tehran Stock Exchange, comprehensive information system of publishers (Kedal) and modern Rahvard software were used. Finally, the data has been prepared using Excel software and then the final analysis has been done using Eviews software. Content analysis method was used to check the level of risk perception from the activity report of the board of directors, the management's interpretive report and the accompanying notes of the financial statements. In order to test the research hypotheses, the dynamic model approach has been used to estimate the models related to the hypotheses.
 
 
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
According to the findings of the research, the risk perception of annual reports has a significant effect on the stock price, and also the company's growth opportunity and profitability have a significant effect on the value relationship between the risk perception of annual reports and the stock price. Also, growth opportunity and profitability as moderators affect the relationship between risk perception and stock price. It can be claimed that Tehran Stock Exchange market is more influenced by economic variables. Therefore, it seems necessary to make policies in macro areas to reduce the feeling of economic risk.
 
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
It can be claimed that Tehran Stock Exchange market is more influenced by economic variables and financial and political variables do not have much effect on this market. Therefore, investors are advised to pay special attention to the effect of risk perception on market returns in financial analysis. In addition, in order to reduce the effect of risk feelings on the economy and especially on the stock market, it seems necessary to make policies in macro areas to reduce the feeling of risk.
 
Keywords: The Value Relevance of Risk Sentiment; Growth Opportunities; Profitability; Static and Dynamic Approach 
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abraham, S., & Shrives, P. J. (2014). Improving the relevance of risk factor disclosure in corporate annual reports. The British accounting review, 46(1), 91-107.
Aggarwal, D. (2022). Defining and measuring market sentiments: A review of the literature. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 14(2), 270-288.
Ahmed, Y., & Elshandidy, T. (2016). The effect of bidder conservatism on M&A decisions: Text-based evidence from US 10-K filings. International Review of Financial Analysis, 46, 176-190.
Bagnoli, M.; Clement, M.; Crawley, M., & Watts, S. (2010). The relative profitability of analysts’ stock recommendations: What role does investor sentiment play. Availableat: http://www. ssrn. com. (In persian)
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross‐section of stock returns. The journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680.
Bao, Y., & Datta, A. (2014). Simultaneously discovering and quantifying risk types from textual risk disclosures. Management Science, 60(6), 1371-1391.
Bergman, N. K., & Roychowdhury, S. (2008). Investor sentiment and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1057-1083.
De Long, J. B.; Shleifer, A.; Summers, L. H., & Waldmann, R. J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of political Economy, 98(4), 703-738.
Dumas, B.; Kurshev, A., & Uppal, R. (2009). Equilibrium portfolio strategies in the presence of sentiment risk and excess volatility. The Journal of Finance, 64(2), 579-629.
Fama, E., & French, K. R. (2001). Newly listed firms: Fundamentals, survival rates. and returns, Working paper, University of Chicago.
Filzen, J.; McBrayer, G., & Shannon, K. (2021). Risk factor disclosures: do managers and markets speak the same language?. Available at SSRN 2863414.
Fu, J.; Wu, X.; Liu, Y., & Chen, R. (2021). Firm-specific investor sentiment and stock price crash risk. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101442.
Garayi Nejad, Gh.; Dakhi Maal, A., & Ostad Ramadan, A, S., (2013). The effect of effective factors on the attraction of foreign direct investment with emphasis on institutional and structural variables, Journal of Financial Economics, 8(29), 131-150. (In persian)
Hemati Asiabarki, M.; Meshki, M.; Gholizadeh, M. H., & Ramazanpour, E. (2015). The Effect of Article 44 of the Constitution Law on Liquidity in Tehran Stock Exchange with Dynamic Panel Data (DPD) and GMM Method. Empirical Research in Accounting, 5(4), 89-108. (In persian)
Hutton, A. P.; Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2009). Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. Journal of financial Economics, 94(1), 67-86.
Kaffashpour Yazdi, M.; Taftiyan, A., & Moeinadin, M. (2021). The Effects of Information Symmetry on the Relationship between Internal Information Quality and Systematic Risk Using Static and Dynamic Approaches. Financial Management Strategy, 9(3), 141-160. (In persian)
Ke, B., & Yu, Y. (2020). Why don’t analysts use their earnings forecasts in generating stock recommendations?. China Accounting and Finance Review.
Keshavarz, H., & Rezaei, M. (2022). The Effect of Economic, Financial and Political Risk on the Risk and Return of Tehran Stock Exchange. Monetary & Financial Economics, 28(22), 127-152. (In persian)
Khoshkholg, I., & Talebnia, G. (2021). Explaining the effect of financial reporting concepts on the level of risk disclosure in annual financial reporting in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 10(38), 455-473. (in Persian)
Khoshkholg, I., & Vakilifard, H. (2021). Explaining the effect of political and moral dimensions of management behaviors on the level of risk disclosure in annual financial reporting in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 10(38), 301-314. (In persian)
Lemmon, M., & Portniaguina, E. (2006). Consumer confidence and asset prices: Some empirical evidence. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(4), 1499-1529.
Li, J. (2017). Investor sentiment, heterogeneous agents and asset pricing model. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 42, 504-512.
Li, J., & Yang, C. (2017). The cross-section and time-series effects of individual stock sentiment on stock prices. Applied Economics, 49(47), 4806-4815.
Liu, Q.; Lee, W. S.; Huang, M., & Wu, Q. (2022). Synergy between stock prices and investor sentiment in social media. Borsa Istanbul review.
Mehradi, R.; Badavarnahandi, Y.; Zeinali, M., & Baradaran Hassanzadeh, R. (2021). Impact of Conservatism in Risk Disclosure on the Information Content of Accounting Information and Stock Return Synchronicity. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 13(2), 33-56. (in Persian)
Merton, R. C. (1973). An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 867-887.
Mian, G. M., & Sankaraguruswamy, S. (2012). Investor sentiment and stock market response to earnings news. The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1357-1384.
Michael, C. J., & William, H. M. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Moradi, M.; Mousavi, S. F., & Marandi, Z. (2018). Investigate the relationship of financial constraints and positive and negative free cash flow on overinvestment and underinvestment in corporate assets using the static and dynamic model. Applied Research in Financial Reporting, 6(2), 233-260. (In Persian)
Myšková, R., & Hájek, P. (2020). Mining risk-related sentiment in corporate annual reports and its effect on financial performance.Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(6), 1422-1443.
Naimah, Z. (2012). Bias in accounting and the value relevance of accounting information. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2, 145-156.
Namazi, M., & Ebrahimi, M. M. (2016). Studying the Disclosure of Risk and Influencial Factors on This Disclosure. (In persian)
Osoolian, M.; Tajvidi, E., & Pazouki, Y. (2021). Investigating Excess Cash, Firm Value and Stock Liquidity Risk in Firms with Growth Opportunities or Financial Constraints. Accounting and Auditing Review, 28(2), 248-273. (In Persian)
Pavtar, A. A. (2017). A Comparative analysis of the effect of IFRS adoption on value relevance of accounting information in an emerging economy: A focus on listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Banking and Finance Research, 3(2), 76-99.
Polk, C., & Sapienza, P. (2008). The stock market and corporate investment: A test of catering theory. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 187-217.
Ryu, D.; Kim, H., & Yang, H. (2017). Investor sentiment, trading behavior and stock returns. Applied Economics Letters, 24(12), 826-830.
Sentana, E., & Wadhwani, S. (1992). Feedback traders and stock return autocorrelations: evidence from a century of daily data. The Economic Journal, 102(411), 415-425.
Shiller, R. J. (2015). Irrational exuberance. In Irrational exuberance. Princeton university press.
Stangler, D. (2010). High-growth firms and the future of the American economy. Available at SSRN 1568246.
Uthman, A. B., & Abdul-Baki, Z. (2014). The value-relevanceof Accounting Information in Nigeria: Analysts’ perception in the IFRS regime. The Journal of Accounting and Management, 4(1).
Vijitha, P., & Nimalathasan, B. (2014). Value relevance of accounting information and share price: A study of listed manufacturing companies in Sri Lanka. Merit Research Journal of Business and Management, 2(1), 1-6.
Wright, P.; Ferris, S. P.; Hiller, J. S., & Kroll, M. (1995). Competitiveness through management of diversity: Effects on stock price valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 272-287.
Xu, N.; Li, X.; Yuan, Q., & Chan, K. C. (2014). Excess perks and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25, 419-434.
Yahaya, O. A.; Onyabe, J. M., & Usman, S. O. (2015). International financial reporting standards’ adoption and value relevance of accounting information of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. Journal of economics and sustainable development, 6(12), 85-94.
CAPTCHA Image