The Relationship between Components of Ownership Structure and Tax Aggressiveness and moderating role of Firms’ Financial Performance

Document Type : پژوهشی

Author

• Abdorreza Asadi

Islamic Azad University

https://doi.org/10.22067/pm.v26i17.71027

Abstract

The actions of managers to apply tax aggressive policies are increasing and companies continue to take the action as long as the costs of these policies are not overpowered the benefits. Present study investigates the relationship between ownership structure and tax aggressive policies.
The sample firms includes 170 listed companies in Tehran stock Exchange over the years 2009-2014. The first three hypotheses are developed to test the relationship between components of ownership structure and tax policies, and forth hypothesis tests moderating role of firms’ performance.
The results indicate significant negative relationship between public and institutional ownership and tax aggressive policies, whereas there is insignificant relationship between private ownership with tax aggressive policies. Moreover the result indicates that by increasing in institutional and public ownership, managers decrease tax aggressiveness but increase in private ownership do not affect managers’ aggressive policies. In the other hand the effect of ownership structure on tax policies in strong firms is highly take place.

Keywords

• Ownership Structure
• Tax Aggressive Policies
• Effective Tax Rate
• Performance of Companies

References

[1] Aghayi, M. A., Anvari rostami, A. A., Sari, M. and Salmani, Y. (2015). Investigation of relationship between corporate governance attributes and corporate tax planning. Journal of financial management strategy, 3 (2), 1-21. (In Persian)

[2] Asadi, A. (2016). Corporate governance and performance of holding companies and subsidiaries in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of financial management strategy, 4 (15), 129- 151. (In Persian)

[3] Asadi, A. Tehrani, R. and Khastoo, S. (2013). The effect of board structure on tax aggressive policies of listed companies in Thehran Stock Exchange. 11th conference of Iranian Accounting, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad. (In Persian)

[4] Babajani, J. and Abdi, M. (2010). Relation of corporate governance and enterprises taxable profit. Journal of financial accounting researches, 2 (3), 65-86. (In Persian)

[5] Bacidore, J. M., Boquist, J.A., Milbourn, T. T., and Thakor, A.V. (1997). The search for the best financial performance measure. Financial analysts’ journal, 55(3), May/June, 10 - 20.

[6] Chen. S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., and Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?, Journal of financial economics‚ No 95‚ 41-61.

[7] Desai, M.A., and Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of financial economics, 79, 145-179.

[8] Dyreng, S.D., Hanlon, M., and Maydew, E.L. (2007). Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The accounting review, vol. 83(1), 61-82.

[9] Foroughi, D. and Mazaheri, E. (2009). The ability of earning and operational cash flow in explanation of shares intrinsic value in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of financial accounting, vol. 1 & 2 (1), 1-16. (In Persian)

[10] Friese, A., Link, S., and Mayer, S. (2006). Taxation and Corporate Governance. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin: Germany.

[11] Hassase yeganeh, Y. (2006). Corporate governance in Iran. Journal of Auditing, 32, 15-31. (In Persian)

[12] Hassase yeganeh, Y. and Pooryanasab, A. (2005). The role of institutional investors in governance of corporations. Journal of accounting, 165, 15-28. (In Persian)

[13] Jensen, M.C. (1986). Agency costs of the free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American economic review, vol. 76, 9-323.

[14] Khurana, L.K., and William, J.M. (2012). Institutional shareholders investment horizons and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of American taxation association, 3(1), 34-48.

[15] Lanis, R., and Richardson, G. (2011). The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50-70.

[16] Martinez, A.L. and Ramalho, G.C. (2014). Family Firms and Tax Aggressiveness in Brazil. International business research, Vol 7, No 3, 129-136.

[17] Minnick, K., and Noga, T. (2010). Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management?, Journal of corporate finance, Vol. 16, 703-718.

[18] Namazi, M. and Kermani, E. (2008). Effect of ownership structure on performance of listed firms in Tehran Stock Exchange. Quarterly journal of accounting and auditing, 15 (53), 83-100. (In Persian)

[19] Noor, R. M., Fadzillah, N. S., and Mastuki N. A. (2010). Corporate tax planning: A study on corporate effective tax rates of Malaysian Listed Companies. International journal of trade, economics and finance, 1(2), 170-193.

[20] Pierk, J. (2016). Are private firms really more tax aggressive than public firms?, WU International taxation research paper series, No 2, Vienna university of economics and business.

[21] Rahimian, N. Rezaei, F. and Mirabdollahi, F. (2013). Relationship between ownership structure and financial performance of listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of financial management strategy, 1 (3), 65- 88. (In Persian)

[22] Ranema roodposhty, F. and Soroushyar, A. (2013). Comparative assessment of the ability of economic and accounting performance measures in explaining value of listed firms in Tehran Stock Exchange. Quarterly journal of financial research, 15 (1), 29-50. (In Persian)

[23] Resaian, A. and Akbari, M. (2013). Investigation of the relationship between tax evasion, transparency and value in listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of monetary and banking research, 6 (16), 159-179. (In Persian)

[24] Tehrani, R. (2005). Financial Management, Tehran: Negahe Danesh publication. (In Persian)

[25] Zanjani, V. and Dehghani, A. (2007). Public finance and government financial policy, Tehran: Termeh publication. (In Persian)