Welfare Effects of Currency Substitution in Iran (1959-2013)

Document Type : پژوهشی

Authors

• zainab ghobaee arani ¹
• bahram sahabi ²
• lotfali agheli kohneshahri ²

¹ Tarbiat Modares University

² Tarbiat Modarres University

https://doi.org/10.22067/pm.v25i15.54854

Abstract

Introduction
The devaluation of an economy and currency substitution(CS) are monetary dimensions, which are usually is faced by developing countries, including Iran. CS occurs when the domestic currency of a country cannot perform its functions and is substituted by a foreign money will. CS The has different effects on all economic factors, including households, firms, and the government, and has caused crises in developing countries in recent decades. This phenomenon weakens the national (domestic) currency of a country, either formally (with the will of the government) or informally (without the will of the government). Due to high inflation rates especially in recent years, this phenomenon is still increasing and, therefore, it is necessary to consider its effects on welfare. A major measure to evaluate the welfare of a society is private consumption. This study examines the effects of CS on welfare through its effects on private consumption.
Theoretical frame work
This study examines the welfare effects of currency substitution (CS) through the impact of the degree of CS on private consumption. Individuals convert currency into different assets under inflation conditions. There are several reasons why this conversion occurs. Some people attempt to take advantage of these assets, while others want to eliminate brid of the opportunity cost of holding money. Therefore, they are willing to put money in various courses, including bonds, stocks, foreign currency (especially dollars), long-term saving deposits, and real assets such as durable goods, estate, and tenement. In this study, since the goal is examining the welfare effects of CS, and CS is the replacement of domestic currency with foreign currency (dollar), then it is necessary to examine only the impact of this asset from among others. Generally, no information is available for determining the exact amount of dollars in circulation. An approximate method is the estimation of the amount of dollars in circulation using Kamin and Ericsson’s (2003) method. Kamin and Erickson used a new method to estimate the amount of dollars in circulation. They added the maximum inflation rate(indicative devaluation of the domestic currency) to the function of money demand. Then the formula was used to estimate the amount of dollars in circulation, in which the coefficient of the maximum inflation rate is used. Afterwards, the degree of CS is obtained. Finally, the effect of CS on consumption is estimated.
Methodology
Before using time-series variables in the studies, it is necessary to determine whether they are stationary or non-stationary. If the time-series variables are not stationary, there may be a problem known as the false regression. In this study, the generalized Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test was employed to perform a single root test, and Schwartzbisin (SBC) statistics was utilized because the observation volume is less than 100. Here, variables are the co- integration of the first order, that is, they are stationary with the first-order difference. Consequently, to estimate the real liquidity demand for money in Kamin and Ericsson’s method and estimate the effect of the degree of CS on private consumption, the Johansen- Juselius co-integration approach is used.
Results and Discussion
One of the normalized vectors of co integration in terms of significance is acceptable. Results showed that the coefficient of the degree of CS as an independent variable in the consumption function is significant and negative. In fact, CS affects private consumption and the welfare of individuals, that is, the degree of CS reduces private consumption and welfare.
Conclusions and Suggestions
The results demonstrated that CS influences consumption because CS is meaningful in the function of consumption and its sign is negative. In fact, increasing CS reduces private consumption and also decreases welfare. Due to the negative impact of CS on consumption, monetary and financial authorities are obligated to make decisions to manage and reduce the degree of this phenomenon. These decisions may include the following:
Real interest rates are negative in Iran for most years. Therefore, controlling the rate of inflation is a way to prevent having a negative real interest rate .
Risk and uncertainty are high in Iran's financial markets. The reduction of risk can help financial markets to become more attractive.
Providing new financial instruments to attract liquidity to the economy like new Islamic financial papers is recommended.
Establishing economic and curbing inflation to prevent the speculation on the real assets of durable goods is suggested.
Preventing the extreme fluctuations of exchange rate is recommended.

Keywords

• Currency substitution
• Welfare
• Private Consumption
• Johansen-Juselius cointegration
• Iran

References

[1] Abuzari, Ayoub & Qanani, Gholam Reza. (2014). Demand for money in dollarized economies (case study: Iran). Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, No. 107, pp. 228-211.(in Persian)

[2] Ahmad, Molud; Tashkini, Ahmad & Suri, Amir Reza. (2008). Estimation of private sector consumption in Iranian economy. Economic Research Journal , No. 1, pp. 39-15. (in Persian)

[3] Arango, Sebastian & M, Ishaq Nadiri. (1981). Demand for Money inOpen Economies. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol 7, pp 69-83.

[4] Arestis,, Philippe & Sawyerr, Malcolm. (2004). The nature and role of monetary policy when money is considered as an endogenous one. Translated by Sanaz (2009). Central Bank Trend Journal, No. 56 & 57, pp. 158-129. (in Persian)

[5] Bade, Robin & Parkin, Michael. (2008). Foundations of economics. Publisher Addison Wesley, edition 4.

[6] Calvo, Guillermo A. & C. A, Rodriguez. (1977). A Model of ExchangeRate Determination Under Currency Substitution and RationalExpectations. Journal of Political Economy, Vol 85, pp 617-25.

[7] Canto, Victor A . & Gerald Nickelsburg. (1987). Currency Substitution: Theory and Evidence from Latin America. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, Massachusetts.

[8] Central bank of Islamic Republic of Iran. Information about the time series of economic accounts, available at www.cbi.ir. (in Persian)

[9] Chang, Roberto & Velasco, Andres. (2002). Dollarization: analytical issues. NBER working paper series, Vol, 8838 , pp 1-23 .

[10] Clements, Bendedict & Gerd Schwartz. (1992). Currency Substitution: The Recent Experience of Bolivia, IMF Working Paper, WP/92/65.

[11] Daei Karimzadeh, Saeed; Mahmoudi, Najmeh & Samati, Majid. (2013). The Currency substitution Test in Iran. Proceedings of the first national electronic conference of the Iranian economy with the approach of national production support. .(in Persian)

[12] El-Erian, Mohamed A. .(1988). Currency Substitution in Egypt and YemenArab Republic. IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 35, no. 1, pp 85-103.

[13] Gujarati, Damodar. (1992). Basics of econometrics. Translated by Hamid Ebrahimi (2012). Tehran: Publishing and Printing Institute of Tehran University. .(in Persian)

[14] Ho, N.W. (2003). Currency Substitution and the Case of Macao, Monetary Authority of Macau. pp 25-38.

[15] Isakova, Asel. (2010). Currency substitution in the economies of Central Asia: How much does it cost? core discussion paper ,Vol 14, pp1-47 .

[16] Jabari, Mohammad (2007). Strategic Report of Inflation Tax. Expediency Council, the Center for Strategic Research, Research Committee on Justice and Welfare, Economic Research Group, Codex Report, 6-84-3-04. (in Persian)

[17] Jayant, Menon. (2007). Dollarization and the Multiple Currency Phenomenon in Lao PDR: Costs, Benefits & Policy Options. Provided in cooperation with: Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI) Tokyo, ADB Institute Discussion Paper, Vol.58.

[18] Kamin Steven B & Neil R.Ericsson. (2003). Dollarization in post-hyperinflationary Argentina. Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol 22, pp 185–211.

[19] Kamin Steven B & Neil R.Ericsson. (1993). Dollarization in Argentina. International Finance Discussion paper, Vol 460.

[20] Keynes, John Maynard. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

[21] Lashkari, Mohammad & Farzin Wash, Assadollah. (2003). Estimating the amount of dollars in circulation and measuring degree of the currency substitution in Iran. Economic Research Magazine. Pages 77-57. .(in Persian)

[22] Lashkari, Mohammad (2009). Currency substitution and Currency smuggling. The Journal of Peyke Noor, No. 4, pp. 85-60. .(in Persian)

[23] Lashkari, Mohammad (2006). The Comparing the degree of dollarization of the Iranian economy and Canada. Economic Letter. No. 2, vol. 2, pp. 100-75. .(in Persian)

[24] Miles, Marc A. (1978). Currency Substitution, Flexible Exchange Ratesand Monetary Independence. American Economic Review, Vol 68, pp 36-428.

[25] Mongardini, Joannes & Johannes Muller. (1999). Ratchet Effects in Currency Substitution: An Application to the Kyrgyz Republic. IMF, WP/99/102, pp 1-23.

[26] Mozayyani, Amir Hossein. (2013). The mutation of exchange rate and its consequences for the Iranian economy. Journal of Political- Economic Information, No. 1, Successive 291, pp. 53-46. .(in Persian)

[27] Nofereasty, Mohammad (2013). The Unit Root and Cointegratione in Econometrics. Tehran: Rasa Cultural Services Institute, Fifth Edition. .(in Persian)

[28] Ortiz, Guillermo. (1983). Currency Substitution in Mexico: The DollarizationProblem, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol, 15, No.2 , pp 85-174.

[29] Özbilgin, H. Murat. (2012). Currency substitution, inflation, and welfare. Journal of Development Economics, No 99 , pp 358-369.

[30] Özbilgin, H. Murat. (2010). Welfare Gains from Disinaation in an Economy with Currency Substitution, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey , No 10 , pp 1-29 .

[31] Padillal, juan. (2010). How does monetary transmission mechanism impact out put, inflation, and money market funds in Argantina?, IMF .

[32] Ramirez-Rojas, C. Lui. (1996). Currency Substitution in Argentina, Mexico and Uruguay , IMF Staff Papers , Vol, 32 , No,4 , pp 626-667.

[33] Ramirez-Rojas, C. Lui. (1985). Currency Substitution in Argentina, Mexico and Uruguay. IMF Staff Papers , December,Vol.32, No .4, pp 626-667.

[34] Samreth, Sovannroeun .(2011). An empirical study on the hysteresis of currency substitution in Cambodia. Journal of Asian Economics , No 22 , pp 518–527 .

[35] Serhiy, Bondarenko. (2000). Currency substitution in a dollarized economy: the case of Ukraine.

[36] Shi Kang, Xu Juanyi. (2010). Twin Dollarization and Exchange Rate Policy. pp 1-31

[37] Sturzenegger, fredrico. (1997). Understanding the welfare implications of currency substitution. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control ; No, 21 , pp 391-416.

[38] Tehranchian, Amir Mansour & Nowruzi Beiraami, Masoumeh. (2011). The Currency Substitution Test in Iran: An Application of Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model (ARDL). Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, No. 49, pp. 115-99. .(in Persian)

[39] Vegh, Carlos A. (1989). The Optimal Inflation Tax in the Presence ofCurrency Substitution. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol, 24 , pp 139-146.

[40] Visser, Hans. (2004). A Guide to International Monetary Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited , Third Edition , Cheltenham Uk.

[41] Yousefi, Ahmad Ali (1998). The Nature of money and its jurisprudential and economic strategies. Qom: Research Center for Islamic Culture and Thought. .(in Persian)

[42] Zamanian, Gholam Reza & Aboozari, Ayoub. (2013). Currency Shocks and Iran's Dollarization. Quarterly Journal of Applied Economic Studies in Iran, No. 5, Second year, pp. 76-57. .(in Persian).

[43] Zamanian, Gholam Reza & Abuzari, Ayoub. (2014). the Unofficial Dollarization in Economy of Iran. Economic Strategic Quarterly, No. 9, Second Year, Pages 131-101. .(in Persian).