Document Type : پژوهشی

Authors

1 Tabriz University

2 Urmia University

Abstract

Introduction
Intertwined structures of modern economies make losses to spread from a sector or a country to other countries or economic sectors. Empirical evidence has shown that markets are not isolated from each other and their movements are not separated. Particularly in recent decade’s development of agencies and international and multinational organizations, developments in information technology (IT), deregulation of financial systems in industrialized countries and immense growth in international capital flows have caused financial markets in the world to have more connections (Bracker & Koch, 1999). Volatilities in various asset markets are intensely in linkage. Therefore, it is vital for investors to have the knowledge of the linkages between financial assets to take the appropriate decisions.
Since the beginning of the summer of 2011 Iran's economy has been through a very special situation as a result of sanctions, targeted subsidies effects, increasing liquidity for many years and other factors. After a long period of exchange rate management in this country, instability gripped the market and consequently, the gold coin market was also experiencing an increase of volatility. Tehran Stock Exchange index began to break the records since 2012. Due to the economic recession and high inflation, entering stock market, coin market or the foreign exchange market as investing alternatives to investors who had hot money in their hands.
In such a turmoil that has been created in the aforementioned property market, these questions may be asked that; how is the structure of interrelationships of assets such as stocks, gold coin and currency in Iran? Is there any evidence of the occurrence of the phenomenon of financial contagion in currency, gold coin and stock markets in Iran?

Theoretical Framework
Many theoretical explanations are presented about financial contagion in the financial literature. In most studies, financial contagion is considered as highly co-movements which is the result of rational behavior of activists in markets with failure (e.g., asymmetric information, risk-bearing capacity, imperfect competition, wealth and borrowing constraints, etc. ) or as irrational decisions by the same market activists (e.g., herding behavior) (Choe, et al., 2012).
According to Claessens and Forbes (2004), financial contagion causes has been classified into 2 groups as follow:

Methodology
Following the study of Choe, et al. (2012), our model consists of three parts: first, we use the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) model proposed by Engle (2002) to capture the time-varying nature of the conditional correlation. Then, inspired by very restrictive definition if contagion provided by World Bank (contagion is defined as a statistically significant change in the correlation dynamics during "crisis times" relative to correlations during "tranquil times"), to examine contagion, we specify modified DCC multivariate GARCH model, with a time dummy variable imposed for representing the turmoil periods and performs the likelihood ratio (LR) test. Finally our results from time-varying conditional correlation test are compared with the results of adjusted traditional correlation test.
Results & Discussion
The obtained results of using t-student test for financial contagion hypothesis between markets indicated that the exchange market as the crisis trigger seems to be affected by the gold coin market. Furthermore, the t-student of their adjusted correlation coefficients during the crisis was significant. This result supports a pure contagion hypothesis after the exchange market shock. Also, the likelihood ratio test results indicated that only linkages between two markets (including exchange market and gold coin market) exhibited contagion evidence. The estimated value of was positive and statistically significant at the 5% level, implying that there was a sudden jump in the conditional correlation dynamics between exchange market and gold coin market. Moreover, the results showed that there is no evidence of financial contagion in the relationship between exchange-stock and gold coin-stock markets. The estimated value of was insignificant in the modified DCC model of the exchange-stock and gold coin-stock markets. This implies that there is no significant jump in the conditional correlation dynamics between the exchange market and stock market as well as gold coin market and stock market during the crisis period. This result is consistent with the conventional t-test results.
Conclusion & Suggestions
Following Choe, et al. (2012), we used a time-varying conditional correlation test for financial contagion among exchange, stocks and gold coin markets during the period of 27/03/2010 to 21/09/2013 in Iran. In this time-varying correlation test, contagion is defined as a structural break in the dynamics of conditional correlation during the crisis period. The reason for the selection of this period of time is dramatic fluctuations in the mentioned market (especially in exchange market and gold coin market) whose starting point was 08/2011. Using the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) model, we found that only the exchange market and gold coin market show evidence of financial contagion.
It is rational that the very high correlation and financial contagion between gold coin and exchange market could actually neutralize the benefits of portfolio diversification. In front, low correlation and lack of financial contagion between stock-exchange markets and stock-gold coin markets nncourages to invest in stock market instead of investing simultaneously in coin and exchange markets in Iran.

Keywords

[1] Abunoori, E., & Abdollahi, M. R. (2012). Relationship between Iran, USA, Turkey and Malaysia Stock Markets in a multivariate GARCH model, Quarterly Journal of Securities Exchange, vol.4, no.14, pp 61-79. (In Persian)
[2] Ang, A., and Chen, J. (2002). Asymmetric correlations of equity portfolios, Journal of Financial Economics 63, 443-494.
[3] Ball, R., and Kothari, S. P. (1989). Nonstationary expected returns: Implications for tests of market efficiency and serial correlation in returns, Journal of Financial Economics 25, 51-74.
[4] Bauwens. L., Laurent, S., and Rombouts, V. K. R. (2006). Multivariate Garch Models: A Survey, Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 21: 79-109.
[5] Becker, K. G., Finnerty, J. E., and Tucker, A. L. (1992). The intraday interdependence structure between U.S. and Japanese equity markets, Journal of Financial Research, vol. 15, pp. 27–37.
[6] Bekaert, G., Campbell, R., and Ng, A. (2005). Market integration and contagion, Journal of Business 78, 39-70.
[7] Bernhart, G., Hocht, S., Neugebauer, M., Neumann, M., and Zagst, R. (2009). Asset correlations in turbulent markets and their implications on asset management, The 3rd Conference on Risk Management & Global e- Business, Incheon, Korea.
[8] Boyer, B. H., Gibson, M. S., and Loretan, M. (1999). Pitfalls in tests for changes in correlations, International Finance Division Discussion Paper No. 597R, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D.C.
[9] Boubaker, H., and Sghaier, N. (2013). Portfolio optimization in the presence of dependent financial returns with long memory: A copula based approach, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 37, Issue 2, pp. 361-377.
[10] Bracker, B., and Koch, P. D. (1999). Economic determinants of the correlation structure across international equity markets. Journal of Economics and Business, vol. 51, p: 443–456.
[11] Calvo, S., and Reinhart, C. M. (1996). Capital flows to Latin America: Is there evidence of contagion effects?, in Guillermo A. Calvo, Morris Goldstein, and Eduard Hochreiter, eds.: Private Capital Flows to Emerging Markets after the Mexican Crisis (Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C.).
[12] Cecchetti, S. G., Lam, P. S., and Mark, N. C. (1990). Mean reversion in equilibrium asset prices, American Economic Review 80, 398-418.
[13] Chiang, T.C., Jeon, B.N., and Li, H. (2007): Dynamic Correlation Analysis of Financial Contagion: Evidence from Asian Markets, Journal of International Money and Finance, 26, 7, 1206-1228.
[14] Corsetti G., Pericoli, M., and Sbracia, M. (2005): Some Contagion, Some Interdependence: More Pitfalls in Tests of Financial Contagion, Journal of International Money and Finance, 24, 1177-1199.
[15] Corsetti, G., Pericoli, M., and Sbracia, M. (2011): Correlation Analysis of Financial Contagion, Kolb, R.W. (ed). “Financial Contagion: The Viral Threat to the Wealth of Nations”, Wiley.
[16] Dornbusch, R., Park, Y., and Claessens, S. (2000). Contagion:understanding how it spreads. The World Bank Research Observer. 15,177–197.
[17] Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation, Econometrica, vol. 50, pp: 987–1007.
[18] Engle, R. F. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation—a simple class of multivariate GARCH models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 20, pp: 339–350.
[19] Engle, R. F., and Sheppard, K. (2001). Theoretical and empirical properties of dynamic conditional correlation multivariate GARCH. Mimeo, UCSD.
[20] Eun, C. S., and Shim, S. (1989). International Transmission of Stock Market Movements, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 24(2). pp. 241- 256.
[21] Eslami Bidgoli, G. R., & Khan Ahmadi, F. (2013). Risk Reduction of Portfolio based on Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity Model in Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Finance Research, vol. 14, issue. 1, pp 17-30. (In Persian)
[22] Fama, E. F., and French, K. R. (1988). Permanent and temporary components of stock prices, Journal of Political Economy 96, 246-273.
[23] Forbes, K. J., and Rigobon, R. (2002). No contagion, only interdependence: Measuring stock market co-movements, Journal of Finance 57, 2223-2261.
[24] Gromb, D., and Vayanos, D. (2002). Equilibrium and welfare in markets with financially constrained arbitrageurs, Journal of Financial Economics 66, 361-407.
[25] Heydari, H., & Molabahrami, A. (2011). Portfolio Optimization Using Multivariate GARCH Models: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Finance Research, vol. 12, issue. 30. 1, pp 35-56. (In Persian)
[26] Imen, G. M., and Rim, A.(2012). A Dynamic Analysis of Financial Contagion: The Case of the Subprime Crisis, Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, vol:4, no: 2, pp:11-27.
[27] Karolyi, G. A., and Stulz, R. M. (1996). Why do markets move together? An investigation of U.S.-Japan stock returns comovements, Journal of Finance, 51, 951-986.
[28] Karimzadeh, M., Amiri, S., Homayonifar, M., & Fallahi, M. A. (2012). Dynamic conditional correlation between stock price index and coins in Iran by using DCC-GARCH, National Conference on Economic Jihad, Faculty of Economics and Adminstrative Sciences ,University of Mazandaran, Iran. (In Persian)
[29] Keshavarz, G. R., & Babaei, A. (2012). Panel Data Stock Returns’ Volatility Modeling (Case study of Tehran Stock Exchange). Journal of Finance Research, vol. 13, issue. 31, pp 41-72. (In Persian)
[30] King, M. A., and Wadhwani, S. (1990). Transmission of volatility between stock markets, Review of Financial Studies 3, 5-33.
[31] Kodres, L. E., and Pritsker, M. (2002). A rational expectations model of financial contagion, Journal of Finance 57, 769-799.
[32] Kyle, A. S., and Xiong, W. (2001). Contagion as a wealth effect, Journal of Finance 56, 1401-1440.
[33] Longin, F., and Solnik, B. (1995). Is the correlation in international equity returns constant: 1960-1990? Journal of International Money and Finance, 14, 3-26.
[34] Longin, F., and Solnik, B. (2001). Extreme correlation of international equity markets, Journal of Finance, 56, 649-676.
[35] Loretan, M., and English, W. B. (2000). Evaluating “correlation breakdowns” during periods of market volatility, International Finance Division Discussion Paper No. 658, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D.C.
[36] Malliaris, A. G., and Urrutia, J. L. (1992). The International crash of October 1987: Causality Tests, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 27, p: 353-364.
[37] Masson, P. R. (1999). Contagion: Monsoonal effects, spillovers, and jumps between multiple equilibria, in Pierre-Richard Agenor, Marcus Miller, David Vines, and Axel Weber, eds.: The Asian Financial Crises: Causes, Contagion and Consequences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.).
[38] McCarthy, J., and Najand, M. (1995). State Space Modeling of Linkages Among International markets, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, vol. 5, p: 1-9.
[39] Mehrara, M., & Abdoli, G. (2006). The role of good and bad news in the stock return volatility in Iran, Iranian Journal of Economic Research, vol. 8, no. 26, pp. 25-40. (In Persian)
[40] Pakizeh, K. (2011). Volatility and Return(Empirical Evidence from Tehran and International Stock Exchanges). Journal of Economic Modeling Research, vol.1, no. 2, pp. 1-20. (In Persian)
[41] Park, Y. C., and Song, C. Y. (2001). Financial contagion in the East Asian crisis: With special reference to the Republic of Korea, in Stijn Claessens, and Kristine J. Forbes, eds.: International Financial Contagion (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA).
[42] Ramchand, L., and Susmel, R. (1998). Volatility and cross correlation across major stock markets, Journal of Empirical Finance 5, 397-416.
[43] Samadi, S., Shirani Fakhr, Z., & Davarzadeh, M. (2007). Investigating the Influence of World Price of Gold and Oil on the Tehran Stock Exchange Index: Modeling and Forecasting, Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp 15-51. (In Persian)
[44] Vaez Barzani, M., Dalali esfahani, R., Samadi, S., & Faaljo, H. R. (2009). The relationship between macroeconomic variables and market value of shares on the Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Economic Research, vol. 5, pp. 31-50. (In Persian)
[45] Valdes, R. (1996). Emerging market contagion: Evidence and theory, Working paper, MIT.
[46] Yuan, K. (2005). Asymmetric price movements and borrowing constraints: A rational expectations equilibrium model of crises, contagion, and confusion, Journal of Finance, 60, 379-411.
CAPTCHA Image