Document Type : پژوهشی

Authors

1 Ph.D. of Economic Sciences, Lecturer in Economics Faculty, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran;

2 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

3 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran;

4 Imam Sadiq University (I.S.U.), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Iran has more than a century of history in exploration and production; the first successful exploration well was Masjid Suleiman-1 on May 26, 1908. Since then, based on the latest oil and gas reports, 145 hydrocarbon fields and 297 oil and gas reservoirs have been discovered in Iran, with many fields having multiple pay zones. Proved oil reserves in Iran, according to its government, rank fifth largest in the world at approximately 150 billion barrels as of 2014, although it ranks third if Canadian reserves of unconventional oil are excluded. This is roughly 10% of the world's total proven petroleum reserves.
Oil sector in most of oil exporting countries (such as Iran) is a state-run sector and oil revenues belong to government. Iran is an energy superpower and the Petroleum industry in Iran plays an important part in it. In 2004 Iran produced 5.1 percent of the world’s total crude oil (3.9 million barrels per day), which generated revenues of US$25 billion to US$30 billion and was the country’s primary source of foreign currency. At 2006 levels of production, oil proceeds represented about 18.7 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). However, the importance of the hydrocarbon sector to Iran’s economy has been far greater. The oil and gas industry has been the engine of economic growth, directly affecting public development projects, the government’s annual budget, and most foreign exchange sources. In 2009, the sector accounted for 60 percent of total government revenues and 80 percent of the total annual value of both exports and foreign currency earnings. Oil and gas revenues are affected by the value of crude oil on the international market. It has been estimated that at the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) quota level (December 2004), a one-dollar change in the price of crude oil on the international market would alter Iran’s oil revenues by US$1 billion.
The main hypothesis of this study is that the government's dependence on oil revenues has been caused policy passivity in Iran's economy. Fiscal policy and monetary policy are the two tools used by the state to achieve its macroeconomic objectives. While for many countries the main objective of fiscal policy is to increase the aggregate output of the economy, the main objective of the monetary policies is to control the interest and inflation rates. Traditionally, both the policy instruments were under the control of the national governments. Thus traditional analyses were made with respect to the two policy instruments to obtain the optimum policy mix of the two to achieve macroeconomic goals, lest the two policy tools be aimed at mutually inconsistent targets. In case of an active fiscal policy and a passive monetary policy, when the economy faces an expansionary fiscal shock that raises the price level, money growth passively increases as well because the monetary authority is forced to accommodate these shocks. But in case both the authorities are active, then the expansionary pressures created by the fiscal authority are contained to some extent by the monetary policies.
In other word the central bank's monetary policy and fiscal policy of the government have a heavy reliance on oil revenues and budgeting and monetary changes, instead of being active and effective, have an affective and passive nature and are subject to oil shocks.
In this study in order to investigate this hypothesis, seasonal data of 1369:1 to 1389:4 of oil revenues, government expenditures (as a representative of fiscal policy), monetary base (as a representative of monetary policy), GDP, exchange rate and GDP deflator (as a representative of price index) in a Factor-Augmented Bayesian Vector Autoregressive model have been used. If a small number of estimated factors effectively summarize large amounts of information about the economy, then a natural solution to the degrees-of-freedom problem in VAR analyses is to augment standard VARs with estimated factors. In this paper we consider the estimation and properties of factor-augmented vector autoregressive models (FAVARs).
Results of impulse response function and variance decomposition clearly confirm the passive monetary and fiscal policy in the Iranian economy. In other words, among the variables of model, the most affected variables respectively are the monetary base and government expenditures. According to the authors, there are two basic ways to deal with policy passivity, which are sterilization and stabilization of oil revenues through the correct management of stabilization funds and diversification of exports. Sterilization is, not to bring all the revenues into the country all at once, and to save some of the revenues abroad in special funds and bring them in slowly. In developing countries, this can be politically difficult as there is often pressure to spend the boom revenues immediately to alleviate poverty, but this ignores broader macroeconomic implications. Sterilisation will reduce the spending effect, alleviating some of the effects of inflation. Another benefit of letting the revenues into the country slowly is that it can give a country a stable revenue stream, giving more certainty to revenues from year to year. Also, by saving the boom revenues, a country is saving some of the revenues for future generations. In addition Oil stabilization funds are usually designed to address the problems created by the volatility and unpredictability of oil revenues, the need to save part of the oil revenues for future generations or both.

Keywords

[1] Ahadi far, S. (1995). Oil revenues, development and third world, cultural and publishing institution of Nazari, Tehran. (In Persian)
[2] Auty, R. (1990). Resource-based industrialisation: sowing the oil in eight developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
[3] Bernanke, Ben. & Boivin, j. (2003). Monetary Policy in a Data-Rich Environment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 3(50), 525-546.
[4] Bernanke, B. & Boivin, j. & Eliasz, p. (2005). Measuring the effects of monetary policy: a factor-augmented vector autoregressive (FAVAR) approach. QuarterlyJournal of Economics, 120, 387-422
[5] Black, F. (1972). Active and Passive Monetary Policy in a Neoclassical Model. The Journal of Finance, 4(27), 801-814.
[6] Christiano, L. & Eichenbaum, M. & Evans, C. (1998). Monetary Policy Shocks: What Have We Learned and To What End?’ NBER Working Paper No.6400.
[7] Cogley, T. & Sargent, T. (2005). Drifts and Volatilities: Monetary Policies and Outcomes in the Post WWIIU.S”New York University. Review of Economic Dynamics, 8, 262–302.
[8] Dehn, J. (2001). The effects on growth of commodity price uncertainty and shocks. World Bank. Development Research 468 group, Policy research working paper, (2455).
[9] Devlin, J. & Lewin, M. (2004). Managing Oil Booms and Busts in Developing Countries. Draft Chapter for: Managing 470 Volatility and crises, A Practitioner’s Guide.
[10] Enders, W. (2007). Applied Econometric Time Series, Translatied by Mahdi Sadeghi and Saeed Shaval Pour, vol. 2, University of Imam Sadeq (PBUH), Tehran. (In Persian)
[11] Farhangi, A. and Shirkavand, S. (2008). The effect of oil revenues on the country's economic management (1353-1383), Knowledge Management, 21 (80), PP. 93-104. (In Persian)
[12] Ganley, J. & Salmon, C. (1997). The Industrial Impact of Monetary Policy Shocks: Some Stylised Facts. Bank of England Working Paper, 68.
[13] Gelb, A.H. (1986). Adjustment to windfall gains. In Neary, J.P. and Van Wijnbergen, S. (Eds). Natural Resources and the Macroeconomy, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
[14] George, E. & Sun, D. & Ni, S. (2008). Bayesian stochastic search for VAR model restrictions. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 553-580.
[15] Gorsuch R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[16] Greenberg, Edward. (2008). Introduction to Bayesian Econometrics, Cambridge University Press.
[17] Hosseini, D.A, M. (2010). The Sectoral effects of monetary policy on the Iranian economy (structural VAR approach). MA Thesis of Islamic Studies and Economics, University of Imam Sadeq (PBUH). (In Persian)
[18] Ivanov, V. & Kilian, L. (2005). A Practitioner’s Guide to Lag Order Selection for VAR Impulse Response Analysis’, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, Vol.9(1).
[19] Keshavarz H, Gh. and Mahdavi, A. (2005). Is the stock market a channel for monetary policy? Journal of Economic Research, (71), PP 147-170. (In Persian)
[20] Koop, G. (2010). Forecasting with medium and large Bayesian VARs, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Wiley Online Library, 1-34.
[21] Koop, G. & Korobilis, D. (2010). Bayesian multivariate time series methods for empirical macroeconomics. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, 3, 267-358
[22] Koop, Gary. (2003). Bayesian econometrics, published by: Wiley-Interscience, ASIN: B0087IFHXW
[23] Madalat, K. (2001). Evaluation of the performance of government monetary and fiscal policies with respect to the role of oil revenues in the economy (econometric analysis). Economic Research, (2) 1, 68-92. (In Persian)
[24] Mardoukhi, B. (2005). Management of oil wealth and foreign exchange reserves, Economy and society, (5) 2. (In Persian)
[25] Mdigliardo, C. (2010). Monetary Policy Transmission in Italy: A BVAR Analysis with Sign Restriction. Czech Economic Review, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, 4(2), 139-167.
[26] Misra, K. B. (2008). Handbook of Performability Engineering, Springer-Verlag. ISBN: 978-1-84800-130-5
[27] Moradi, D. (2010). Iran's oil impact on macroeconomic indicators with an emphasis on transmission mechanisms and effects. Journal of Economic Research, 2, 140-115. (In Persian)
[28] Nazari, M. and Mobarak, A. (2010). Abundant natural resources, Dutch disease and economic growth in oil-exporting countries. Energy Economics Studies, (27), 47-68. (In Persian)
[29] Poelhekke, S. & Van der ploeg, S. (2007) Volatility, Financial Development and the Natural Resource Curse, CEPR Discussion Papers, No. 6513, Oxford: CEPR.
[30] Poirier, D. (1998). Revising beliefs in non-identified models. Econometric Theory, 14, 483-509.
[31] Romer, D. (2006). Advanced Macroeconomics, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
[32] Sabouri, H. (2006). The Nature of money and inflation in the the Iranian economy, Donyaye eghtesad, (1160), PP 45-32. (In Persian)
[33] Shakeri, A. (2000). The nature of inflation in the Iranian economy, Ph.D thesis, University of Shahid Beheshti. (In Persian)
[34] Shakeri, A. (2008). Macroeconomics: Theories and Policies, Volume II, Farsi Nevisa publishing, First Edition, Tehran.
[35] Sims, C. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality’, Econometrica, 48(1), 148-169.
[36] Sims, C. A. & Stock, J. & Watson, M. W. (1990). Inference in Linear Time Series Models with Some Unit Roots,” Econometrica, 113-144.
[37] Sorensen, P. (1984). Countercyclical versus Passive Monetary Policy in a Medium-Run Macro Model, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 4(86), 452-467.
[38] Stock, J. H. & Watson, M. W. (1991). A probability model of the coincident economic indicators, in G. Moore & K. Lahiri, Eds. The leading Economic Indicators: New Approaches and Forecasting Records (Cambridge University Press) 63-90.
[39] Sturm, M. & Gurtner, F. & Alegre, J. (2009). Fiscal Policy Challenges in Oil-Exporting Countries. European Central Bank, Occasional Paper Series, 104, 1-62
[40] Vermunt, J.K. & Magidson, J. (2005). Factor Analysis with categorical indicators: A comparison between traditional and latent class approaches. In A. Van der Ark, M.A. Croon and K. Sijtsma (eds), New Developments in Categorical Data Analysis for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41-62. Mahwah: Erlbau.m 
CAPTCHA Image