Document Type : پژوهشی

Authors

Abstract

Pricing and rationing policies for controlling energy consumption are important
factors in resisting economies. For this end we have compared Willingness to Pay
and rationing policies enacted for different gasoline and dual consumption
automobiles, to see statistically,(1)Whether there is any difference between their
energy usage and WTP? (2)Whether there is any difference between energy volume
rationed between different kinds of automobiles, and their WTP? Discovering endusers’
willingness to pay a questionnaire is designed, and based on sampling 200
questionares are distributed among gasoline and dual consumption consumers of different automobiles in Mashhad city randomly. In this study, Contingent Valuation
Method (CVM) is used to investigate willingness to pay for gasoline consumption
that is based on energy policies experienced in Mashhad in 2008. Descriptive
Method is used to describe the energy space situation in the public; and nonparametric
statistical tests have been used to provide some explanations for research
questions. Results indicate that, (1)there is statistically significance between energy
consumption (gasoline and gaz), and WTP; so different pricing policies is
desireable; (2) there is not any statistially significance between WTP rationing
volumes provided for different automobiles; and WTP; so pricing policies should be
the same for all kinds of automobiles

Keywords

[1] Akbari, N., Shajari, H. & Bidram, R. (2008) Car Users Willingness to Pay
Estimation for Gasoline (CVM) Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 79:
39-58 (in Persian).
[2] AliMardani, P., Kermanshah, M. (2008) Gasoline Willingness to Pay Survay
Sharif University Civil Engeenearing Journal, 24(42): 13-20 (in Persian).
[3] Biel, A., Johansson-Stenman, O. & Nilsson A. (2011) The Willingness to
Pay–Willingness to Accept Gap Revisited: The Role of Emotions and
Moral Satisfaction Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(6): 908-917.
[4] Brown, T. C. , Champ, P. A. , Bishop, R. C. , and McCollum, D. W. (1996)
Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public
Good. Land Economics, 72(2).
[5] Cameron, T. A. James, M. D. (1986) Utilizing Closed-Ended Contingent
Valuation Survey Data for Preliminary Demand Assessments UCLA
Economics Working Papers 415, UCLA Department of Economics.
[6] Chaudhry, P., Singh, B., Tewari, V. P. (2007) Non-Market Economic
Valuation in Developing Countries: Role of Participant Observation
Method in CVM Analysis Journal of Forest Economics, 13(4- 5): 259-275.
[7] Elkhafif, M. A., Kubursi, A. A. (1993) The Demand for Gasoline: a Two
Stage Approach International Journal of Forecasting, 9(4): 457-465.
[8] Eltony, M. N. (1996) Demand for Gasoline in the GCC: an Application of
Pooling and Testing Procedures Energy Economics, 18(3): 203-209.
[9] Espey, M. (1998) Gasoline Demand Revisited: An international meta analysis of Elasticities Energy Economics, 20(3), 273-295.
[10] Feng, Y., Fullerton, D., Gan, L. (2005) “Vehicle Choices, Miles Driven
and Pollution Policies”Cambridge, M.A.
[11] Gonzalez-Caban, A., Loomis, J. B., Rodriguez, A., Hesseln, H. (2007) A
Comparison of CVM Survey Response Rates, Protests and Willingness-to-
Pay of Native Americans and General Population for Fuels Reduction
Policies Journal of Forest Economics, 13(1): 49-71.
[12] Graham, D., Glaister, S. (2002) The Demand for Automotive Fuel: A
Survey of Elasticities, Journal of transport Economics and policy, 36(1), 1-
26.
[13] Horowitz, J. K., McConnell, K.E. (2003) Willingness to Accept,
Willingness to Pay and the Income Effect Journal of Economic Behavior &
Organization, 51(4):537-545.
[14] Khataee, M. , Aghdami, P. (2005) Price Elacticity Analysis for Gasoline
in Iran’s Transportation Sector and Demand Forcasting Iranian Journal of
Iran’s Economic studies, 7(25): 23-46 (in Persian).
[15] Kniivilä, M. (2006) Users and Non-Users of Conservation Areas: Are
There Differences InWTP, Motives and the Validity of Responses In CVM
Surveys? Ecological Economics, 59(4): 530-539.
[16] McFadden, D. (1986) The Choice Theory Apporach to Market
Research. Marketing Science, 5(4).
[17] Nagle, T. T. & Holden, R. K. (2002) Opportunity Costs: A Practical
Illustration The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing, Prentice Hall Marketing
Series, p: 29.
[18] Park, S. Y. & Zhao, G. (2010) An Estimation of U.S. Gasoline Demand:
A Smooth Time-Varying Cointegration Approach, Energy Economics,
32(1): 110-120.
[19] Shakeri, A., Mohammadi, T. , Jahangard, E. & Moosavi, M. (2010)
Gasoline Deamd Estimation with Stractural Model in Transportation
Sector Iranian Journal of Energy Economic Studies, 7(25): 1-31(in Persian).
[20] Sohaili, K. (2010) The Effect of Determining Gasoline Price According
to Market Mechanism on Environment Pollution (Case Study of Iran)
Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2: 270-273(in Persian).
[21] Su, Q. (2011) The Effect of Population Density, Road Network Density,
and Congestion on Household Gasoline Consumption in U.S. Urban Areas
Energy Economics, 33 (3):445-452.
[22] Tsur, M. (2008) The Selectivity Effect of Past Experience on
Purchasing Decisions: Implications for The WTA–WTP Disparity Journal
of Economic Psychology, 29(5):739-746.
[23] Wahud, Z. & Daniel, J.G. , Noland, R.B. (2007) Modeling Fuel Demand
for Different Socioeconomic Groups Transportation Research Board 86th
Annual Meeting.
[24] West, S. E. (2004) Distributional Effects of Alternative Vehicle
Pollution Control Policies, Journal of public economics, 88(3-4): 735-757. [25] Westendorp, P. W. (1976) NSS-Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM)-A New
Approach to Study Consumer Perception of Price. Proceedings of the
ESOMAR Congress.
[26] Zaranejad, M. & Ghapanchi, F. (2008) Error Corection Model
Estimation for Gasoline Demand in Iran Iranian Journal of Commercial
Research, 11(42): 29-52 (in Persian).
CAPTCHA Image