The Optimal Size of Government in Point of View Achieving Maximum Economic Welfare in Iran

Document Type : پژوهشی

Authors

• Mozhgan Moallemi
• Mohammad Reza Ghasemi
• Hedayat Karimzadeh

https://doi.org/10.22067/pm.v21i7.43018

Abstract

Government size and its effects on an economy is one of the important issues in
economic researches. Recently, many attempts have been made to determine the
optimal size of government and its effects on economic growth in most countries,
spatially in the developing countries. Since, economic growth is just one of the
dimensions of development, it is not sufficient the investigation of economic growth
index in order to determine the optimal size of government. So the index of
economic well-being (IEWB) is needed to express the state of social welfare.
In this paper, consistent to Osberg and Sharp (1998), the index of economic well being (CIEWB1) will be calculated for period of 1978-2007. Then we investigate the
relationship between the size of government and economic well- being based on
Armey nonlinear model in order to determine the optimal size of government.
Moreover, the paper, analyzes the long- term relationship between them by using an
auto-regressive distributed lag model (ARDL) as well as long- term Dynamics by
vector auto-regressive process.
The Estimation results reveal a nonlinear relationship between government size and
economic welfare for Iran. The results imply that the optimal size of government is
20.8% and 5.9% based on the ratio of consumption and investment expenditure,
respectively. Also, there is no a long- term relationship between government size
(based on two indexes) and index of economic well-being. Moreover, the results
show that the effects of fluctuations of government size on economic welfare are not
permanent.

Keywords

• Economic Welfare
• Optimal Size of Government
• CIEWB Index
• Investment Expenditure and Consumption Expenditure of Government
• Army's Model

References

[1] Afzaliabarghoei, V., and A. Assari Arani. (2010), the relationship between

government size and human development (Comparison between owner oil

countries and non- oil owner developing countries), Social Welfare Quarterly,

tenth year, Vol. 36, PP. 61-90 (in Persian).

[2] Armey, D. (1995), the freedom revolution, regnery publishing, Washington.

[3] -Davies, A. (2009), Human development and the optimal size of government,

Journal of Socioeconomics, Vol. 38, pp. 326-330.

[4] Hosseini, M., and A. Jafari Saminmi. (2010), Economic welfare in Iran: An

application of composite index of economic well- being (CIEWB), Quarterly

Iranian Economic Research, fourth year, Volume 42, PP. 101-122 (in Persian).

[5] Komeijani, A. and R. Nazari. (2008), Then effect of size of government on

economic growth in Iran, Journal of economic research, ninth year, Vol. 3,

PP. 1-28 (in Persian).

[6] -Laffer, A. (2004), The Laffer Curve: Past, present, and future. Heritage

Foundation Backgrounder, No. 1765, Literature 32, pp. 1176–96.

[7] -Nili, F. (1995), Economic growth, income distribution and social welfare in

years of 1982- 1993, the journal of programming and budgeting, vol. 1, May

1995, pp. 47- 62 (in Persian).

[8] -Noferesti, M. (2010), The unit root and co- integration in Econometrics:

Tehran, Rassa Publication, third edition, pp. 23- 35 (in Persian).

[9] -Osberg, Lars & Andrew Sharpe. (2009a), New estimates of the index of

economic well-being for selected OECD countries, CSLS research report,

November.

[10] -Osberg, Lars. (2009b), measuring economic security in insecure times: new

perspectives, new events, and the index of economic well-being, CSLS

research report, December.

[11] -Osberg, Lars & Andrew Sharpe. (2004), An index of labor market wellbeing

for OECD countries, Centre for the Study of Living Standards,

Dalhousie University, January, pp. 3-5.

[12] -Osberg, Lars & Andrew Sharpe. (2005), How should we measure the

economic aspects of well-being, Review of Income and Wealth, 51 (2), pp.

311-336.

[13] -Osberg, Lars & Andrew Sharpe. (2002a), An index of economic well-being for selected OECD countries, Review of Income and Wealth, 48 (3), pp. 291-

316.

[14] -Osberg, Lars & Andrew Sharpe. (2002b), The index of economic wellbeing,

The Journal of Social Health Volume 1, No. 2, pp. 24-62.

[15] -Osberg, Lars & Andrew Sharpe. (2002c), International comparisons of

trends in economic well-being, Social Indicators Research, Volume 58, pp.

349-382.

[16] -Osberg, Lars & Andrew Sharpe. (2001), The index of economic well-being:

An over view, Review of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Centre

for the Study of Living Standards, Dalhousie University, March 27.

[17] -Osberg, Lars & Andrew Sharpe. (1998), An index of economic well-being

for Canada, Research Report, Applied Research Branch, Human Resources

Development Canada, December.

[18] -Osberg, Lars. (1985), The measurement on economic well-being,

MacDonald Commission, University of Toronto Press, Volume 36, pp. 48-

87.

[19] Rahmani, Teimoor. (2001), Macroeconomics, 8th Edition: Tehran, Vol. 2,

pp. 129-131 (in Persian).

[20] Sayadzadeh, A., A., Jafarisaminmi and S. Karimi Petanlar. (2007), the

relationship between size of government and economic growth in Iran:

Estimation of Armey’s Model, Journal of Peike Noor, fifth year, Vol. 4, PP.

95-112 (in Persian).

[21] Tarazkar, M., and M., Zibaei (2004), the criteria of social welfare, income

distribution and poverty in urban and rural societies (the case of provinces of

Fars, Esfahan and Semnan), The Journal of Agricultural Economics and

Development, twelve years, winter 2004, vol. 48, pp. 32-52 (in Persian).

[22] -United Nations Development Program. (1990, 2001, 2004), Human

development report, Oxford University Press, New York.

[23] -United Nations. (1954,1980,1985,1990,1995,2000,2005), Report on

international definition and measurement of standards and levels of living,

New York.

[24] -Vedder, R.K. & Gallaway, L.E. (1998), Government size and economic

growth, Paper Prepared for the Joint Economic Committee, pp 1-15.

[25] -Yavas, A. (1998), Does too much government investment retard the

economic development of a country, Journal of Economic Studies, 25 (4), pp.

296–330.